<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Invisible Ads</title>
	<atom:link href="http://marketingteaparty.com/2009/10/16/invisible-ads/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://marketingteaparty.com/2009/10/16/invisible-ads/</link>
	<description>Leading the revolt against bad marketing advice and half-baked ideas. A blog by Ron Shevlin</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 05:26:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Novo</title>
		<link>http://marketingteaparty.com/2009/10/16/invisible-ads/#comment-295</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Novo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 15:06:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marketingteaparty.com/?p=831#comment-295</guid>
		<description>When I graduated college, I thought I wanted to work in an ad agency.  Not being terribly &quot;creative&quot;, I was destined for &quot;account management&quot;.  

So I visit some agencies and find the vast majority of the work entry level people are doing is looking at &quot;tear sheets&quot; - you know, physical proof the advertising ran in this newspaper or that magazine.

Ford Motor was one account I spent time with.  Hundreds of people with stacks of physical ads - national, local, co-op, all of it.  I said no to the job.  But it made sense; I mean, you want to know that the ad you paid for actually ran, right?  Accountability to client?

And this is what is wrong with online Display advertising - nobody even knows if their ad ran, where it ran, etc.  Partly because it would cost more to admin this stuff than the ads are worth.  Cost more, on a relative value basis, than hundreds of people sitting around with physical tear sheets.

Until that changes, online Display will be a rounding error versus all advertising; you just can&#039;t spend more on it than you can afford to intentionally flush down the toilet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When I graduated college, I thought I wanted to work in an ad agency.  Not being terribly &#8220;creative&#8221;, I was destined for &#8220;account management&#8221;.  </p>
<p>So I visit some agencies and find the vast majority of the work entry level people are doing is looking at &#8220;tear sheets&#8221; &#8211; you know, physical proof the advertising ran in this newspaper or that magazine.</p>
<p>Ford Motor was one account I spent time with.  Hundreds of people with stacks of physical ads &#8211; national, local, co-op, all of it.  I said no to the job.  But it made sense; I mean, you want to know that the ad you paid for actually ran, right?  Accountability to client?</p>
<p>And this is what is wrong with online Display advertising &#8211; nobody even knows if their ad ran, where it ran, etc.  Partly because it would cost more to admin this stuff than the ads are worth.  Cost more, on a relative value basis, than hundreds of people sitting around with physical tear sheets.</p>
<p>Until that changes, online Display will be a rounding error versus all advertising; you just can&#8217;t spend more on it than you can afford to intentionally flush down the toilet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ron Shevlin</title>
		<link>http://marketingteaparty.com/2009/10/16/invisible-ads/#comment-294</link>
		<dc:creator>Ron Shevlin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 13:15:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marketingteaparty.com/?p=831#comment-294</guid>
		<description>Paul: I&#039;m just trying to raise the bar on blog quality.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Paul: I&#8217;m just trying to raise the bar on blog quality.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: paul amisano</title>
		<link>http://marketingteaparty.com/2009/10/16/invisible-ads/#comment-293</link>
		<dc:creator>paul amisano</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 13:01:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marketingteaparty.com/?p=831#comment-293</guid>
		<description>is that a viagra ad i see?  ron!  sinking to new lows.  errr, i mean new highs?!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>is that a viagra ad i see?  ron!  sinking to new lows.  errr, i mean new highs?!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
