My Influence Is Growing (Like Pinocchio’s Nose)

2 Sep

The Creative Group released the results of a survey in which they asked advertising and marketing executives: Do you believe the influence a company’s marketing professionals have on business decisions has increased or decreased in the last three years? They found that:

Although the recession has hit many marketing departments hard, there is some good news for those in the creative industry:  61% of marketing and advertising executives interviewed said marketing teams have greater influence on business decisions than they did three years ago. This compares to 23% who believe marketing professionals hold less sway.”

Let me see if I have this right. They asked advertising and marketing execs if they — the advertising and marketing execs — have had more influence on business decisions?

Maybe it’s me, but don’t you think they should have asked….oh, I don’t know….the CEOs and CFOs of firms if marketing has had more influence?

Furthermore, the way the question was worded, they weren’t even asking if they — the advertising and marketing execs — have had more influence on business decisions in their own firms, but about marketing professionals in general.

So what can we make of the results? Were the 23% who said marketing has had less sway admitting that they have had less influence? And are the 61% who said marketing has had more influence reflecting first-hand, intimate knowledge of what goes on in other firms?

I don’t know. What I do know is that I’m quite sure that my own influence grows with every blog post I write. Of that, I’m quite sure.


3 Responses to “My Influence Is Growing (Like Pinocchio’s Nose)”

  1. David Gerbino September 2, 2009 at 8:21 pm #

    I love this kind of research Ron. The Creative Group made their assumptions based on 250 telephone interviews — 125 with advertising executives randomly selected from the nation’s 2,000 largest advertising agencies and 125 with senior marketing executives randomly selected from the nation’s 2,000 largest companies.

    Ok, if I am in the advertising agency industry, of course I am making an influence and I am going to tell everybody I am. Pick a random ad agency website and they will tell you how great they are. They will tell you about the 200% list in response of their work versus a control. So what. Did it make money? The better agencies are addressing that (fair and balanced).

    If I am a CMO, of course I am going to say I have greater influence. I am a superstar. The last statistic I have is CMO’s average life span is less than 2 years. Data from this link (6/21/2006) – http://www.mpdailyfix.com/2006/06/good_readin_article_on_ceo_lif.html

    I agree with you. I would have liked to hear from the CEO/CFO/COO of companies that spend money on marketing. For starters I would have liked to see this data stratified by size and industry.

    @dmgerbino

    • Ron Shevlin September 4, 2009 at 2:05 pm #

      @David: What I would have liked to hear is…why did the researcher think this was research-worthy in the first place? Who the hell cares is marketers (in general) are more influential? Is this research actionable? Not from what’s been reported, at least.

  2. Brent Dixon September 9, 2009 at 12:19 am #

    First: Good lord. Of course if you ask a group of people – who are also struggling through a rough economy – “are you relevant?!” they’re going to scream “yes! yes we are! feed us!”

    Second: Do you think a worse economy can be good for creative shops because they require less commitment than in-house marketing teams?

    Third: The conclusion could be actionable if it meant a change in how businesses are operating. If marketing (say!) and operations (do!) were starting to bleed together a little more. There may be lessons to learn.

Leave a Reply